|
|
|
|
|
Most of the above photos were taken by me with a video camera.
For More Skydiving Friends Click HERE !
See Bob and Mikes photo
Here
As
many of you know, I was featured in an
article
in "Skydiving" in Oct 2000 about
getting
a "PRO" Rating through the FAA instead
of
the USPA. As a member of the USPA pretty
much
since 1978, I've felt that for the most
part
it was a very good organization. We've
had
our differences but who doesnt?
However,
about 2 years ago I called "Safety
and
Training" at USPA to inquire as to why
a
certain paragraph was removed from the SIMs.
It
was the paragraph that told you to see the
FAA
for permission to jump into areas where
normally
a USPA license would be required IF
you
didnt belong to USPA And that the FAA could
ask
to see a demonstration of your skills to
make
their decision.
Here is the part of
the FAA Advisory Circular dated
1/2/91 and found at
www.faa.gov/avr/AFS/ac105-2c.txt
(section d) " If the applicant is unable to present
sastifactory evidence that he/she has the experience,
skill, and knowledge required for USPA/DOD
credentials, the FAA inspector may require
a
demonstration of comparable skill before issuing
the authorization."
Note the use of the word "may". That doesnt mean
he HAS to. i.e. If for instance he is already
aware
of your skill level, he's not required to force you
to
make a demonstration jump. On the other hand,
few officers would sign off on a "Pro" rating without
being absolutely positive of your skill level.
Anyway,
what I got from a certain head of
USPA
safety was a snotty reply as to why it
had
been removed and how I'd never be able
to
do Demos without the USPAs blessing.
He
went on to tell me how the USPA had the
FAA
in their back pocket as far as ratings and
the
ability to do demos. He told me that I
would
be completely wasting my time to approach
the
FAA for approval, and that my demo days
were
over without USPA..... "We are God now"
was
his implication while snickering the whole
time.
THATS
what pissed me off...
now
it was personal.
So
the rest as they say is history, and page
12
of Octobers "Skydiving" gives a good
account
of what transpired next. (although a
misunderstanding
led to a 20 foot landing area
that
was really only 3 foot)
Anyway, point is that I
still think the USPA is
a
great organization, but like all entities that get
a
little too big for their britches, needs a
reality
check now and then. And if it ever comes
to
pass that my government can force me to
belong
to a private organization in order to meet
any
regulation set forth by my government
I'll
move to Russia.
PS...see
where I did my Demo for the
FAA
by clicking ....... HERE
"You
call, we fall, that's all"...
There
are no words to describe SKYDIVING....
To
understand it, you must DO it!
From
18 to 80....Everyone can enjoy the thrill
of
FREEFALL, in the form of a TANDEM JUMP!
For More Information On Skydiving, Click Image Below.